Do 5000 Year Old Stone Models PROVE Ancients Understood High Tech Sciences? #GoXplrr Hutton Pulitzer

WYOMING, Jackson Hole 43°31′N 110°50′W :  Personally, my belief is mankind has forgotten more than we currently know or even have documented.  Some believe mankind has either been  destroyed or decimated several times over.  At times, you have to ask yourself (aside from technological advances) are we evolving or devolving?  All this at a time when mankind is learning more than we have ever learned before and steadily gaining a grasp on our origins and our purpose, and maybe just maybe – our ancestors actually did  know more about some things then we know now. 

But as always, there is a catch.  The damn human condition and that “free-will” bit inherent in all of us, and as this article maintains – the ever present ASS SLAG (read on ASS SLAG is an ACRONYM).

One group wants NO NEW DISCOVERIES, since it will challenge conventional thinking and render their expensive educations and multi-degrees  useless – if we find proof which collides with and goes against academic thinking.

Then there is the other group – the one that thinks every single generation of mankind is smarter  than the preceding generation.  Those who are set in stone that way are IN NO WAY going to ever admit ancient man might of been smarter than modern man.  Why?  They live by the irrevocable edict that ancient man lived only lived in caves, could not communicate, did not travel the world and could only grunt, hunt and make baby bumps.

Unfortunately, nowadays there is a third group which needs to be added to those who set back learning and advancement for the sake of prideful beliefs – the “Aggrandized-Self-Seer-of-Secret-Languaged-Ancient-Ghost” (or ASS SLAG for short).  Now this group, with no training, no research skills, no cross checking, no tools, no peer review, no forensic tools and certainly no common sense, will go around promoting they are “reading the rocks and terrain finding symbols, signs and giving one the answers to them you always wanted to know.” 

The only thing more detrimental to history (than government, Church, ruling parties and academics worried about their credentials and not being the discover of something historic) is the ASS SLAG (remember ASS SLAG stands for Aggrandized-Self-Seer-of-Secret-Languaged-Ancient-Ghost).

What happens with the ASS SLAG is they get people to believe in their creative pontifications about history and ancients by deploying such line drawing, truth obscuring photos and such “documentation” is spread around and the cycle begins once again.

(1) Academics harangue and deny a find brought forth.  (2) Know-it-alls jump on the fake “vitriol” bandwagon and then the Academics use the  (3) “ASS SLAG’s pontifications as proof that ALL LAYMEN and WOMEN are idiots and thereby default cannot make a huge historic discovery.  And then the cycle repeats all over.  Wash, Rinse, Repeat, 1-2-3, Wash, Rinse Repeat – as if shampoo bottle instructions are instructions for life.

Feeding this harmful cycle the ASS SLAG prevent  individuals do care about history and are outside of the self cannibalizing academic system – cannot make head way.  One always expects academics to bash finds by non-academics, but when the non-academic adopts academic standards in their documentation and top scientific and forensic standards in their work, then the non-academics can fight for a find on level ground and let the market (and or press decide).

But, then there is the ASS SLAG.  The ASS SLAG does not care either way.  One day it’s their hobby and the next day they promote themselves as consulting professionals.  But, instead of actually being professional and adopting professional standards, they ride in like a Wyoming Sheep Herder, declare themselves a mystic and seer of all things Ancient, but when the chips are down they cannot back up their finds or pontifications.  They then retreat to their small world, grab a few more Coronas, snap a few more selfies  (professionally posing as an expert with their ever present beer in hand – and that’s another image problem of non-academics, but that’s a whole different article) and eventually they pop back up again, seeing turtles, birds of paradise, elephants, masonic messages, Templar Treasure Signs and the ever present Ancient Ghost (or Ghosts depending IF  proper grammar is used).

It seems like real, passionate, dedicated and detailed researchers of the hidden and forgotten cannot get ahead simply because the ASS SLAGs won’t adopt standards and the Academics use the ASS SLAG’s fables against those seeking the real truth of history and the ancients.

The story below is a prime example, is quite historic, but the Academics use the musings of ASS SLAGS against the find and the story keeps not getting the traction it rightly deserves.

carved-stones-museum-ashmolean

COULD PREHISTORIC CARVINGS REPRESENT ATOMS?
Five carved stone balls are part of the collection at the Ashmolean Museum that were discovered in Scotland (Kincardineshire, Aberdeenshire and Banff). The purpose of those objects is unknown and is baffling archaeologists.

They are made of different stones like sandstone and granite and they are dated back to the Neolithic period between 3000 and 2000 BC. More than 400 stones have been found in Scotland and, including the five stones of the Ashmolean Museum, they have something peculiar about them. As you can see in the picture, on the stones around the surface there are engraved symmetrical patterns.

towie-stonecarved-stone

Most of the stones are of similar size with a diameter of 70mm with the exception of a few larger ones up to 114mm in diameter. The number of knobs on the stones varies from 4 up to 33 with some of the stones also including strange spiral patterns. The stone on the image was found at Skara Brae on Orkney and dates back to 3400 to 2000 BC.

Another famous stone is the Towie Stone that was found on Glas Hill in Aberdeenshire. It is about 3 inches in diameter and contains three embossed round surfaces but each surface includes multiple spiral-like symbols. This stone is also dated back to 2500 to 1900 BC.

The five stones of the Ashmolean museum were part of the collection of Sir John Evans who thought that they have been used probably during war attached to a thong. However such an explanation doesn’t make sense because a) the stones found have zero damage on them, which wouldn’t be the case if they were thrown during war times and b) it would require much skill to prepare even one of those stones just to throw them to the enemy.

Other explanations include that they were used as weights for fishing nets or had a ceremonial role giving the holder the right to speak. But again using the stones as weight wouldn’t explain the complexity of making them.

There is another possible explanation though. Could they be models of the nucleus of atoms? Such a representation of atoms has been widely used in our times as shown in the example image on the left. Is it possible that whoever made those objects had knowledge of chemistry and could represent the atomic structure of different atoms?

 

Five carved stone balls are part of the collection at the Ashmolean Museum that were discovered in Scotland (Kincardineshire, Aberdeenshire and Banff). The purpose of those objects is unknown and is baffling archaeologists.

They are made of different stones like sandstone and granite and they are dated back to the Neolithic period between 3000 and 2000 BC. More than 400 stones have been found in Scotland and, including the five stones of the Ashmolean Museum, they have something peculiar about them. As you can see in the picture, on the stones around the surface there are engraved symmetrical patterns.

Most of the stones are of similar size with a diameter of 70mm with the exception of a few larger ones up to 114mm in diameter. The number of knobs on the stones varies from 4 up to 33 with some of the stones also including strange spiral patterns. The stone on the image was found at Skara Brae on Orkney and dates back to 3400 to 2000 BC.

Another famous stone is the Towie Stone that was found on Glas Hill in Aberdeenshire. It is about 3 inches in diameter and contains three embossed round surfaces but each surface includes multiple spiral-like symbols. This stone is also dated back to 2500 to 1900 BC.

The five stones of the Ashmolean museum were part of the collection of Sir John Evans who thought that they have been used probably during war attached to a thong. However such an explanation doesn’t make sense because a) the stones found have zero damage on them, which wouldn’t be the case if they were thrown during war times and b) it would require much skill to prepare even one of those stones just to throw them to the enemy.

Other explanations include that they were used as weights for fishing nets or had a ceremonial role giving the holder the right to speak. But again using the stones as weight wouldn’t explain the complexity of making them.

There is another possible explanation though. Could they be models of the nucleus of atoms? Such a representation of atoms has been widely used in our times as shown in the example image on the left. Is it possible that whoever made those objects had knowledge of chemistry and could represent the atomic structure of different atoms?

– See more at: http://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-technology/could-strange-prehistoric-carved-stone-balls-represent-atoms-00607#sthash.xl3JKA5Z.dpuf

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s